Evolution, Mind, and Behavior Conference at UCSB

Fall Quarter 2002

 

Joint UCLA-UCSB Conferences held quarterly by

UCSB's Evolution, Mind, and Behavior Program (EMB) and

UCLA's Human Nature and Society Program (HNAS)

 

The Evolution, Mind and Behavior conference is THIS SATURDAY at UCSB.  Details follow, and maps and directions can be

found on the Center for Evolutionary Psychology website

(www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep).

 

 

Saturday 2 November 2002

 

Location: Harbor Room, University Center (UCEN), UCSB

(see directions below)

Schedule:

9:30 AM Breakfast buffet opens

 

10:30 AM First talk: Steve Rothstein, Cultural stability and variation in

bird song: evidence, reasons, and relations to song development and

function

 

12:00 PM Lunch.

 

1:30 PM Second talk: Phil Walker, Human evolution from the Fourth

Horseman's perspective: What do we know about patterns of death in earlier

human populations?

 

3:00 PM Coffee break

 

3:30 PM Third talk: Jim Sidanius, The Interactive Nature of Patriarchy and

Arbitrary-set Hierarchy: The Dynamics of Sexism and Racism from An

Evolutionary and Social Dominance Perspective

 

5:30 PM Adjourn for no-host dinner, Ming Dynasty (see below)

 

ABSTRACTS FOLLOW.  For directions to UCSB and parking, see the Center for

Evolutionary Psychology website at www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep

 

10:30

Steve Rothstein Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, UCSB

rothstei@lifesci.ucsb.edu

 

Cultural stability and variation in bird song:

Evidence, reasons, and relations to song development and function

 

Abstract. Bird song has served as a model system in biology for a number

of reasons: developmental processes that are similar to those that occur

in human speech, cultural variation that provides parallels with human

traditions, key functional aspects that affect fitness in critical ways as

regards inter- and intra-sexual interactions and neurological processes

and structures that relate to complex behaviors. In this talk, I will

review some of our on going studies of song development and function in

cowbirds with special emphasis on song variation as a cultural trait.

Although they are brood parasites reared by numerous other species of

birds, cowbirds learn song variations only from conspecifics. One category

of cowbird songs, flight whistles (FWs), appears to develop from a

virtually blank slate and can assume any type of sound structure that

songbirds are capable of producing. Different FW types or cultures occur

as well defined dialects with discrete spatial borders and vary so much

that cowbirds and human birdwatchers fail to recognize some previously

unheard dialects as cowbird vocalizations. Although there is considerable

dispersal and gene flow, dialects are temporally stable because males that

disperse learn to produce their new dialect and females, which do not

sing, learn to prefer mates that give the appropriate local dialect. Males

with the "correct" local dialect are probably preferred because many males

do not complete vocal development until 2 years of age so that FW type is

an uncheatable indicator of age and indirectly of genetic quality. The

high social valence of performing the correct local dialect is the likely

reason dialects are stable and this stability is maintained within

populations even during genetic change due to extensive gene flow. Thus

although cultural evolution is generally thought to be more dynamic than

genetic evolution, the reverse is true in this and possibly other systems

in which conformity to a local culture is a key social convention.

 

12:00-1:30

Lunch, UCEN

 

1:30

Phil Walker UCSB Anthropology pwalker@anth.ucsb.edu

 

Human evolution from the Fourth Horseman's perspective:

What do we know about patterns of death in earlier human populations?

 

Abstract. Understanding the mortality patterns of our ancestors is

obviously fundamental to any Darwinian analysis of modern human

adaptations, including our evolved cognitive capabilities. Death is a

depressing subject and, perhaps because of this, there is a strong

tendency for evolutionary biologists to view human "reproductive success"

from the rosy, positive side of the birth-to-death ratio.

        A review of the empirical data currently available on mortality patterns

in earlier human populations reveals the depth of our ignorance concerning

basic demographic parameters such as average age at death and how it has

changed through time. Although collections of ancient human skeletal

remains seem at first glance to be an easy to interpret source of

paleodemographic information, the interpretive problems such collections

present are formidable. Bioarchaeological studies clearly show that age

and sex-specific patterns of differential deposition and recovery can

greatly skew the demographic profiles of skeletal collections.

Paleodemographers are also beginning to reluctantly accept the

counterintuitive fact that the age distributions of skeletal collections

provide us with more information about fertility rates than they do about

average age at death.

        In view of these interpretive problems, what can we say with any certainty

about the history of human mortality patterns? First, there is the obvious

fact of population growth: beginning in the Upper Paleolithic period, a

long-term demographic equilibrium shifted in the direction of excess

births. This has led to the pattern of exponential growth that is by far

the most important adaptive challenge modern humans face.

Bioarchaeological data provide a number of insights into the causes of

this growth. They suggest that factors influencing the mortality rates of

young women are key to understanding human demographic evolution.

 

3:00-3:30

Blood sugar break

 

3:30

Jim Sidanius UCLA Psychology sidanius@psych.ucla.edu

 

The Interactive Nature of Patriarchy and Arbitrary-set Hierarchy:

The Dynamics of Sexism and Racism from An Evolutionary and Social

Dominance Perspective

 

Abstract. Using evolutionary psychology and social dominance theory (SDT)

as the theoretical frameworks, this presentation will suggest that we

re-think the problem of prejudice and discrimination in a number of

specific ways. This re-thinking includes: a) fully appreciating the fact

that the problems of prejudice and discrimination are most probably not

primarily a question of intergroup antipathy, b) possibly accepting the

fact that discrimination and intergroup oppression is intimately

associated with the apparently ubiquitous tendency for human social

systems to form and maintain group-based social hierarchies, c) fully

embracing the necessity of understanding the problem of discrimination and

intergroup conflict using multiple levels of analysis, and even theorizing

about the intersections among these levels of analysis, and d) accepting

the fact that the some of the essential dynamics of discrimination and

prejudice might be qualitatively different, depending upon the targets of

that discrimination. Thus, the subordinate-male-target hypothesis within

SDT suggests that, while related to one another, sexism is a qualitatively

different phenomenon than racism.

 

5:30

Self-funded dinner at Ming Dynasty

(Ming Dynasty 805-968-1308, 290 Storke Road, at the intersection of Storke

and Hollister in Goleta. In the unlikely event you are coming from 101,

take Storke exit North of UCSB).

 

Cosponsored by the UCSB Center for Evolutionary Psychology and the UCLA

Center for Behavior, Evolution and Culture. This event is organized as a

working seminar for faculty and graduate students. For more information,

please contact Leda Cosmides or John Tooby or call 805-893-8720.

UCLA and UCSB will hold a Saturday conference once a quarter, alternating

between the two campuses. This one, the first in 2002-2003, will be in the

UCSB University Center, Harbor Room (downstairs).