|

Behavior, Evolution, and Culture Speaker
Series
Mondays 12:00-1:30, Haines Hall 352,
UCLA
Free
lunch will be provided for attending UCLA
faculty and graduate students, and for undergraduates who are enrolled
in the BEC seminar. For budgetary reasons, non-UCLA attendees who
wish to partake of the lunch will be asked to make a $7 per person
donation.
Spring
Quarter 2006
3
April: Peter Whybrow Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human
Behavior and Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Science,
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine http://www.peterwhybrow.com
American
Mania: When More Is Not Enough
Dr. Whybrow poses the question,
“Are we Americans becoming the first addicts of the technological
age?” Despite an astonishing
appetite for life, more and more Americans are feeling overworked and
dissatisfied in the world’s most affluent nation, epidemic rates
of stress, anxiety, depression, obesity, and time urgency are now grudgingly
accepted as part of everyday existence—they signal the American
Dream gone awry. Drawing upon
economics, history, evolutionary psychology, and scientific case studies,
Dr. Whybrow ground the extraordinary achievements and excessive consumption
of the American nation in an understanding of the biology of human craving
and the reward system of the brain—offering a comprehensive physical
explanation for the addictive mania of consumerism. Whybrow shows how
human biology is ill equipped to cope with the demands of the 24/7,
global, information-saturated, rapid-fire culture we not only have created
but also have come to crave.Dr. Whybrow concludes with a discussion
of how one may step back from this treadmill to live a healthful life.
But he also offers a cautionary tale:
As a society if we do not learn to curtail our cravings, we may
be entering a self-destructive phase. Fundamental
to change will be an objective evaluation of the laissez-faire market
ideology and a reinvigoration of our role as citizens in this driven
consumer culture. American Mania Quiz
10
April: Jeffrey Davis California State University Long Beach Department
of Sociology
Fisher’s
Sociological Imagination
Fisher
is widely known for his extraordinary contributions to population
genetics and evolutionary biology. His sociological insights have
received far less attention, even though five of the twelve chapters
of The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection are devoted to developing
a theory of the evolutionary consequences of human social organization.
For my presentation, I will review Fisher's sociology and the parameters
of his model of social organization. I also offer some extensions
to Fisher's model. In conclusion, I contend that Fisher's insights
provide the basis of a rich theoretical research program in evolutionary
sociology.
17
April: Chris Guzelian Searle Scholar, Northwestern University
School of Law
Evolution,
Selfish Lies, and Free Speech
Evidence
increasingly suggests that selection between competing ideas to become
a prevailing social belief may be strongly influenced by evolutionarily
descended limitations on human sensory and mental capabilities. Scholars
posit that these limitations permit many "selfish" ideas
to gain social traction and spread epidemically, driving out and shutting
out truth from collective understanding in the selection process.
An evolutionary perspective, combined with settled principles of free
speech law, indicates that the explicit combating of various selfish
false ideas through technological, educational, legal, financial,
or other means may be necessary to avoid self-sustaining mass delusions
in a globalizing world.
24
April: Joseph Campos UC Berkeley Department of Psychology; President,
International Society on Infant Studies
Co-sponsored
by the UCLA Interdisciplinary Relationship Science Program
On
the Epigenesis of Fear in the Human Infant
There is a fascinating paradox
about fear of heights in humans and some animal species. Such fear
has enormous biological adaptive value, represents a true life-span
emotional reaction, and constitutes one of the strongest and most
reliably-elicited fears in the human. As such, one would expect fear
of heights to be innate, or under strong maturational control. Indeed,
until recently, it was so considered. However, there is now no doubt
that fear of heights develops as the result of experience, more specifically
experiences linked to the onset of self-produced locomotion. It is
not a maturational or innate event.
What creates fear
of heights and how does locomotor experience play a role in its ontogeny?
We can rule out three likely candidates as playing a causal role.
Depth perception is well established before such fear develops; falling
experiences are relatively rare; and maternal emotional signaling
has little if any impact at the age of onset of locomotion. What,
then, may be the process(es) by which such biologically-adaptive wariness
comes about?
In this talk,
evidence is presented for the role of a discrepancy between sensory
systems in the ontogeny of these fears. The discrepancy we propose
to be playing a causal role is related to the discrepancy that in
adults makes heights “dizzying.” More specifically, one
experiences height vertigo when information reaches the brain that
the head and body is moving (even minutely so), but visual information
discrepantly fails to confirm such self-movement. It turns out that
infants have good vestibular and kinesthetic information about self-movement
from early in life, but lack responsiveness to flow in the visual
periphery until after the acquisition of locomotor experience. So,
only after “visual proprioception” becomes functional
is the infant capable of experiencing the discrepancy that produces
height vertigo.
The talk will:
(a) Visually illustrate what visual proprioception is (it is not a
phenomenon well-known to behavioral scientists),
(b) Provide evidence
for the role of locomotor experience on visual proprioception, and
(c) Present results
of two studies showing correlations between responsiveness to optic
flow and the probability of showing wariness of heights in infants
at two different ages.
Click here to download the paper (Word document)
1
May: Nancy Burley UC Irvine Department of Ecology
& Evolutionary Biology
Sexual
Imprinting: New Approaches to an Old Problem
Sexual
imprinting, a process by which early contact with parents shapes the
mate preferences of developing young, has been widely documented among
birds and has been reported for other vertebrates, especially mammals
(including humans). Historically, studies of imprinting have emphasized
causal and ontogenetic perspectives, with function and evolutionary
consequences receiving less attention. Recent quantitative models
have investigated a possible role for sexual imprinting in vertebrate
speciation processes, but little empirical support for this possibility
has been provided. Moreover, recent studies suggest that sensory drive
processes exert strong, unlearned influences on mate preferences which
might override tendencies to imprint on novel traits that emerge in
incipiently diverging populations. Here I report results of several
experiments designed to evaluate the tendency of both sexes of zebra
finches to imprint on novel traits of parents with otherwise normal
phenotypes. The novel (experimental) traits are crests of various
colors and patterns. Previous research (Burley & Symanski 1998)
indicates that female zebra finches reared with wild-type (uncrested)parents
have sensory biases favoring white-crested males; normally reared
males lack this bias and favor uncrested females. By rearing young
with crested parents, I investigated how sensory drive and imprinting
processes interact. Results suggest that imprinting responses of both
sexes may vary considerably with the perceived information content
of experimentally manipulated traits, and that some evolutionarily
novel traits may promote reproductive isolation in diverging populations.
Click here to download the paper (PDF)
8
May: Michael Shermer Skeptic
Magazine
Evonomics:
Natural Selection, the Invisible Hand, and the New Science of Evolutionary
Economics
There are a number
of parallels between evolution and economics that we shall explore
on two tiers—historical and theoretical: the parallels between
natural selection and the invisible hand; the nature of evolution
and the characteristics of a free market economy; the reluctance to
accept the theory of evolution and free market economics; evolution
and economics as emergent properties; how evolution shaped economic
behavior; and contingency in evolution and path dependency in economies.
In short, natural selection and the invisible hand are analogous descriptors
for analogous phenomena.
15
May: Bruce Winterhalder UC
Davis Department of Anthropology
Seven
Reasons to Remain a Forager
Archaeological
research shows that many human populations continued to hunt-and-gather
for thousands of years after beginning the use of plant domesticates.
This kind of mixed economy is rare in the ethnographic literature
on foragers and horticulturalists; its persistence for millennia in
the early stages of agricultural origins is inexplicable under much
current theory. In this paper I describe models and concepts from
evolutionary anthropology which may help us to explain this novel,persistent,
prehistoric mode of production. The more important ones include (a)
the population ecology of the domesticates themselves, (b) environmental
fluctuation, (c) temporal discounting of subsistence options, (d)
maintenance of technological knowledge in low-density populations,
and (e) institutional mechanisms of risk-manage under changing economic
regimes. Collectively these ideas are meant to demonstrate, contra
Sahlins and substantivism, the utility of a selective set of micro-economic
concepts in the study of pre-market economies.
22
May: Robert Hoffmann Department of Economics, Nottingham University
Business School, The University of Nottingham
Religion,
Religiosity and Cooperation: An Experimental Study from Malaysia
Huntington's
notion of a clash of cultures has attracted a great deal of attention
in recent years. In particular, religious differences as well as religious
fundamentalism have been identified as crucial dimension of present
culture clashes. We conducted a study to explore to what extent different
religions and religiosity affect the economic interactions between
individuals as a test of this notion. The study is based on religious
attitude surveys and incentivised economic experiments with repeated
prisoner's dilemma play among Malaysian subjects. The multi-ethnic
nature of Malaysia is ideally suited to match subjects for game play
from the world's major religions (Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism,
Hinduism and Buddhism) while holding other socio-economic factors
constant.
29
May: Memorial
Day Holiday
5
June: Dacher Keltner UC Berkeley Department of
Psychology
Evolution's
Soul: What Laughter, Smiling, Lip Puckers, and Goosebumps Tell us
About the Evolution of Human Goodness
In
this talk I will present recent work on the pro-social emotions. I
will present studies of smiling, the relations between oxytocin and
the nonverbal displays of love and desire, and recent evidence exploring
the role of vagus nerve activity in compassion and pro-social dispositions.
I will use these data to offer the beginnings of a theory of the emotion-related
origins of pro-sociality, drawing upon Darwin's own speculations and
those of recent philosophers and behavioral scientists.
Winter Quarter 2006
9 January: Dan Posner UCLA Department of Political
Science http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/posner
Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision in Kampala, Uganda:
An Experimental Approach
16 January: Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday
23
January: Steven
Gaulin UCSB
Department of Anthropology
A
Real-World Foraging Task Yields a Female Advantage and Significant Content
Effects.
Though Silverman and
Eals division-of-foraging-labor hypothesis cannot explain the cross-species
distribution of sex differences in spatial ability, it does make a novel
prediction: women will more accurately remember the location of stationary
resources. Unfortunately, Silverman
and Eals’ own tests of this hypothesis have yielded weak and
inconsistent support, possibly because the tasks used to assess the
hypothesized female advantage lack ecological validity. I will present
results of a controlled field study carried out at a large farmers
market. Women performed significantly
better than men at remembering the location of food items they had tasted,
but not at remembering the location of non-food landmarks. In addition, accuracy was significantly
correlated with the caloric content of food items, suggesting specialization
of this particular cognitive system.
30 January: Rafael Nuņez UCSD Department of
Cognitive Science
Embodied Cognition, Objectivity,
and Truth: Lessons from Mathematics
and Spatial Construals of Time in Aymara
How can we
"objectively" share abstract entities with others, in a stable and
consistent way? How can we evaluate "Truth" when purely imaginary
entities are concerned? Mathematics provides a very intriguing case for
studying these questions. Indeed, mathematics, on the one hand deals with
purely imaginary entities (e.g., a Euclidean point has only location, but no
extension! ... And there is no such "real" thing in the entire
universe!), and on the other hand, it provides extremely stable patterns of
true-valued inferences (i.e., theorems) that once proved, stayed proved for
ever (e.g., the Pythagorean Theorem). In this talk I will analyze these
issues by looking at (1) my own work on the Cognitive Science of Mathematics
(with George Lakoff) taking examples from set and hyperset theory, and (2) my
field work in the Andes' highlands studying--with convergent
linguistic-gestural-ethnographic methods--a very peculiar form of spatial
construal of time in the Aymara culture. I'll address the question of the
role of axiom systems in generating and sustaining truth, and will show that
the nature of truth and objectivity in abstract conceptual systems lie on the
intricacies of the underlying bodily-grounded human cognitive mechanisms
(e.g., conceptual metaphors, metonymies, analogies, blends) that make them
possible.
6 February: Gail Heyman UCSD Department of Psychology http://www.psy.ucsd.edu/~gheyman
Children’s Reasoning about
People as Source of Information
The human capacity to acquire
knowledge from others, rather than only relying upon what can be observed or
experienced directly, opens vast opportunities for learning. As a result
of this capacity, humans are highly adaptable across many contexts.
However, the use of such
information can also pose difficulties. For example, sources may
provide incorrect or misleading information, either intentionally or
unintentionally. In this talk, I will focus on children's evaluation of
others as sources of information within one particular context: when
people talk about themselves. The findings I will present, which
include data collected in the U.S. and in China, address how children's
reasoning is affected by the content of the message, and by the social
context in which the communication occurs.
13 February: John Patton California State University
Fullerton Department of Anthropology
Coalitional Psychology and the Conundrum of Altruism: a
case from the Ecuadorian Amazon
The search for solutions to
the conundrum of altruism is a central focus of evolutionary approaches to
the study of human behavior. The focus of this talk is to present data
on cooperation collected among horticultural foragers in the Ecuadorian
Amazon to argue that a better understanding of the conundrum of altruism, and
its constraints, can be gained by examining human cooperation as an aspect of
an evolved coalitional psychology. Coalitional psychology is that aspect
of human nature designed to construct mental representations of coalitional
structures, to triangulate oneself and others within coalitional structures,
to reason about and pursue behavioral strategies within
coalitional contexts, and to evoke emotional states that led to actions that
result from or create coalitional consequences. Apart from
explicit or implicit attempts to detect group boundaries (ethnic, spatial, or
political) and the collection of basic demographic data,
evolutionary ethnographers do not routinely collect data on coalitional
structures. Without such data it is difficult to assess the influences
of coalitional thinking on cooperation which predicts that people will weigh
the costs and benefits of cooperating differently depending on
their position within their coalitional. Even in egalitarian societies
some people are more equal than others. In this talk I will integrate
data on coalitional structure derived from network analysis techniques, with
data on behavior within three separate domains of cooperation
(status allocation, meat sharing, and experimental economic games) to
illustrate influences of an evolved coalitional psychology on patterns of
human cooperation.
20 February: President's Day Holiday
27 February: Teresa Seeman UCLA David Geffen School of
Medicine Division of Geriatrics
Exploring a Bio-Psychosocial Model of
Cumulative Risk – Biological Pathways Linking Life Experience and
Health Outcome in Aging
Dr. Seeman will discuss evidence linking
socio-economic, social and psychological resources to trajectories of health
and aging and the multiple biological pathways through which these factors
appear to impact on health outcomes over the life course. Possible sex and/or ethnic differences in
these patterns of association will also be discussed.
6 March: Leeat Yariv Caltech Division of Humanities and
Social Sciences, UCLA Department of Economics
Conformity In The Lab
In this talk, I
will briefly survey the existing literature on social learning and conformity
(both theoretical and experimental) and then present evidence from an array
of new experiments disentangling conformity, an intrinsic taste to follow
others, from informational herding in a sequential choice setting. In these
experiments, we use a design reminiscent of the standard social learning
setup in which subjects choose the
type of information they observe before making a decision. Namely, subjects
choose between observing a private and informative signal or observing a
social signal manifested in the history of play of predecessors who have not chosen a private signal. Even
though the latter type is essentially a word of mouth signal, entailing no
statistical information, a significant fraction of subjects choose it
persistently. Allowing for payoff externalities by paying subjects according
to a collective action chosen by a majority vote amplifies the results. So
does an increase in the stakes. Our design allows us to rule out alternative
explanations the literature proposes such as confusion and inequality aversion.
13 March: Terrence Deacon UC Berkeley Department of
Anthropology
Devo-Devo: How Relaxed
Selection Can Contribute To The Evolution And Self-Organization Of
Complexity
Although biologists have long
recognized examples of regressive processes in evolution as well as a role
for regressive processes in the development of brains, research interest
tends to focus on presumably constructive and progressive processes under the
influence of natural selection. Particularly in the case of human brains and
their evolution, it is generally assumed that the neurological differences
underlying the complexity of human language abilities must have arisen due to
progressive improvements of function via selection favoring these traits. In
this talk I will explore an alternative possibility: that devolutionary
loss-of-function due to reduced selection,
including degradation of developmental-genetic specificity, may contribute to
the evolution of novel complex neural functions, such as language. The
general logic of this argument originates from a critique of a commonly cited
evolutionary mechanism: the Baldwin Effect. Although this theoretical
“effect” is often invoked as an evolutionary mechanism leading
from functional plasticity to increased specificity of genetic control,
biological examples and simulation studies will be presented that show that
the opposite effect is more likely, and also that there are other surprising
correlates of this process. An animal example—song production in a
domesticated species of finch—illustrates this effect and its
paradoxical consequence. In this breed, increasingly complex song structure,
expanded involvement of forebrain mechanisms, greater flexibility of
behavior, and a larger contribution from social learning evolved without positive
selection for these traits. Instead, these birds were bred for feather
coloration. Absence of selection on song appears to have led to evolutionary
degradation of song control specificity and with it unmasking of otherwise
hidden synergies among diverse brain systems able to play some role in song
structure. These results suggest some informative parallels with features of
human language functions, and the possibility that regressive evolutionary
processes might play an important role in the evolution of biological
complexity more generally.
Fall Quarter 2005
3
October: Joseph Manson UCLA Department of Anthropology
Father-Daughter Inbreeding Avoidance Reduces Male
Reproductive Skew
in a Wild Primate Population
Inbreeding
reduces fitness in various taxa, and several behavioral and physiological
mechanisms have evolved that inhibit fertile matings between close kin. Most
commonly, members of one or both sexes disperse before breeding. In primates,
males usually disperse and females often benefit from lifelong relationships
with maternal kin within the group. Females thus risk breeding with their
father if the tenure length of the dominant male, who usually sires most
group offspring, exceeds the time it takes daughters to mature. Attempts to
determine whether such co-resident father-daughter pairs systematically avoid
inbreeding have produced equivocal results, and no published studies have
addressed this question by genetically ascertaining paternity in a wild
population. We determined paternity for 117 wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) born into our study
population. As expected, alpha males dominated reproduction. However, while
siring the great majority (79%) of the offspring born to unrelated females,
alphas sired only 6% (1 of 17) of the offspring conceived by their daughters
during their tenures, providing evidence for effective inbreeding avoidance
without female dispersal.
10
October: Antoine Bechara USC Department of Psychology
Decision-Making
and Impulse Control After Frontal Lobe Injuries
For a long time,
the prefrontal cortex has been considered a “non-functional”
brain area, and understanding its function has lagged behind nearly all other
areas. This is no longer true since appreciation of the vital role that this
brain region plays in adaptive behaviors, and especially decision-making, is
now evident more than ever. I will highlight the recent progress that has
been made in this area of research. Decision-making is a term often referred
to in the psychological literature as one of the “executive
functions”, which play a role in managing (like an executive) other
cognitive functions, such as memory, attention, and language. Considerable
research efforts have been directed towards differentiating various processes
of executive functions, but much of this effort in the past has focused on
the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPC) sector. I will focus on
decision-making and its link to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPC),
and highlights the role of evolution in shaping the function of this area of
the brain.
17 October: Susan Perry UCLA Department of Anthropology,
Cultural Phylogeny Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
http://www.eva.mpg.de/phylogen
Social
learning in wild capuchin monkeys
Recently,
discoveries of site-specific behavioral patterns such as the use of hammers
and anvils or stick tools in extractive foraging have been documented in wild
ape populations. Such discoveries have
given rise to much speculation regarding the evolution of cultural capacities
in humans, and claims have been made that chimpanzees have a greater capacity
for “culture” than any other nonhuman animal. However, theoretical models used to predict
the circumstances under which social learning is expected to become important
would not predict unusually high reliance on social learning to be unique to
apes. Capuchin monkeys, for example,
by virtue of their gregarious, tolerant nature, omnivory, extreme dependence
on alliance partners, and extractive foraging niche, would be predicted to be
highly reliant on social learning.
In this talk, I present the
findings of a cross-site investigation (4 study sites, 13 social groups, 10
researchers, 19,000 hrs of data) documenting behavioral variation in social
conventions and foraging techniques in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Whereas the ape “culture” researchers
stopped at cross-site comparisons and declared the observed variation to be
cultural by process of elimination, I continued to investigate the source of
the variation by conducting cross-sectional and developmental studies in my
data base from Lomas Barbudal (5 social groups, roughly 30,000 hrs of data
dating from 1990). In this talk I
present data on social conventions and also data on the acquisition of
foraging techniques in young capuchins.
Social influence is most important between the ages of 2-4 years, and
by age 5, capuchins have conformed to the technique they observed most. This conformity takes place over a very
slow time scale, contrary to theoretical expectations about the speed of
social learning.
24
October: Francisco J. Ayala UCI Departments of Ecology &
Evolutionary Biology and Philosophy
http://www.faculty.uci.edu/profile.cfm?faculty_id=2134
Darwin’s Greatest Discovery: Natural Selection versus
Intelligent Design
Darwin is deservedly
given credit for the theory of biological evolution. He accumulated evidence
demonstrating that organisms evolve and diversify through time. Most important, however, is that he
discovered natural selection, the process that accounts for the adaptive
organization of organisms and their features; that is, their
“design.” But the design
of organisms is not intelligent, as it would be expected from an engineer,
but imperfect and worse: the defects, dysfunctions, oddities, waste—and
even cruelty and sadism if judged by human values—that pervade the
living world are incompatible with their being the outcome of an intelligent
designer, unless this designer would also be intentionally deceitful and
malevolent.
31
October: Paul Zak Claremont Graduate University Neuroendocrine Foundations of
Trust Department of Economics
http://www.pauljzak.com
Oxytocin
Increases Trust in Humans
The traditional
view in economics is that individuals respond to incentives, but absent
strong incentives to the contrary selfishness prevails. Moreover, this “greed is good”
approach is deemed “rational” behavior. Nevertheless, in daily interactions and in
numerous laboratory studies, a high degree of cooperative behavior
prevails—even among strangers. A
possible explanation for the substantial amount of “irrational”
behavior observed in markets (and elsewhere) is that humans are a highly
social species and to an extent value what other humans think of them. This behavior can be termed
trustworthiness—cooperating when someone places trust in us. A number
of recent experiments from my lab have demonstrated that the neuroactive
hormone oxytocin facilitates trust between strangers, and appears to induce
trustworthiness. In rodents, oxytocin
has been associated with maternal bonding, pro-social behaviors, and in some
species long-term pair bonds, but prior to the work reviewed here, the
behavioral effects of oxytocin in humans had not been studied. This presentation discusses the
neurobiology of positive social behaviors and how these are facilitated by
oxytocin. My experiments show that
positive social signals cause oxytocin to be released by the brain, producing
an unconscious attachment to a stranger.
7
November: Margo
Wilson & Martin Daly McMaster University Department of Psychology
Carpe diem: adaptation and devaluing
the future
The
future is almost always worth less to organisms than the present, and evolved
psychologies and physiologies 'discount' it accordingly. However, exactly how
they do so, how they should do so, and whether real discount functions match
theoretical expectations, are unresolved and/or controversial in various
details, which will be the focus of discussion.
SPECIAL LATE-AFTERNOON DISTINGUISHED SPEAKER LECTURE -- OPEN
TO THE PUBLIC, BRING A FRIEND!!
The UCLA Center for Behavior, Evolution,
and Culture is proud to announce the first in an occasional series of public
lectures spotlighting the work of the most distinguished scholars in
evolutionary behavioral science. In
addition to their BEC talk, the
eminent (and dynamic!) duo of Martin
Daly and Margo
Wilson will speak on Monday, November 7th from 4:00 to 5:30 p.m. in 362
Royce Hall. Their focus:
Risky
business: future discounting, inequality, and homicide
Homicide occurs
primarily in competitive contexts, and can be considered an extreme
manifestation of willingness to take risks and disregard future consequences
in the pursuit of current goals. This
argument suggests that factors that affect risk-taking and the perceived
value of the future relative to the present will affect homicide rates. What such factors may be, and how they help
explain the remarkable variability of homicide rates, will be examined in
this talk.
14 November: Jeffrey Brantingham UCLA Department of Anthropology
http://paleo.sscnet.ucla.edu
Gone in 6
Seconds: the Foraging Behavior of Los
Angeles Car Thieves
How
specialized is your average Los
Angeles "auto boost"? This
talk draws on both new and classic foraging models to examine the search
strategies deployed by Los Angeles car
thieves and evaluates the decision making process underlying how they select
individual cars to steal. It seems plausible that many of the foraging
behaviors deployed by car thieves are linked to psychological and behavioral
capacities that evolved among our hunter-gatherer ancestors. It is less
likely that there is specialized (or broken) cognitive module linked to
"deviant behavior". A dash of both trial-and-error and social
learning mixed with generalized psychological and behavioral capacities is
sufficient to generate very effective car thieves.
21 November: Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan Department of
Psychology
Voluntary
Settlement and the Spirit of Independence
There is a general consensus that the history of voluntary
settlement in the western frontier constitutes a major element of American
individualism. Yet, if voluntary settlement is a causal factor that promoted
tacit beliefs and practices of independent agency, there should be similar
beliefs and practices among a group of people even in the midst of an
entirely different cultural ethos of interdependence as long as the group had
undergone voluntary settlement in the recent past. We thus examined residents
of Japan’s northern island (Hokkaido). Hokkaido was extensively settled by ethnic Japanese from the
1870’s for several decades. Many of the current residents of Hokkaido are the descendents of the original settlers from this period.
As predicted, Japanese socialized and/or immersed in Hokkaido were nearly as likely as European Americans in North America to
commit a dispositional bias in causal attribution, to associate happiness
with personal achievement, and to show a personal dissonance effect wherein
self-justification is motivated by a threat to personal self-images. In
contrast, these marker effects of independent agency were largely absent for
non-Hokkaido residents in Japan. Implications for theories of cultural change are discussed.
28 November: Gregory F. Grether UCLA Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology
http://www.eeb.ucla.edu/Faculty/Grether/research.htm
Environmental Change, Phenotypic Plasticity and Genetic
Compensation
Normal
development depends on specific environmental inputs. Consequently, when a species
encounters novel environmental conditions, some traits may develop
abnormally. Changes in the environment can occur, for example, because of
climate change or habitat degradation. Like genetic mutations, most
environmental perturbations of development are detrimental, and thus natural
selection would usually be expected to favor genetic changes that gradually
restore the ancestral form of the trait in the new environment. I
recently coined the term "genetic compensation" to describe this
form of adaptive evolution. When genetic compensation occurs along a spatial
environmental gradient, it partially or completely masks the effects of the
gradient on trait development. This means that populations of a species that
look the same in the wild may develop quite differently if placed in a common
environment. In addition, genetic compensation may lead to a cryptic form of
reproductive isolation between populations, explain some puzzling cases in
which heritable traits exposed to strong directional selection fail to show
the expected evolutionary response, and complicate efforts to monitor
populations for signs of environmental deterioration. In this talk, I will
explain how genetic compensation differs from related phenomena, such as
genetic assimilation and canalization, and review putative examples to
illustrate the above points.
5 December: Craig McKenzie UC San Diego Department of
Psychology
http://www-psy.ucsd.edu/~mckenzie/
Framing Effects and Rationality
Framing
effects are said to occur when "equivalent" redescriptions of
objects or outcomes lead to different preferences or judgments. For example,
a medical treatment is seen more favorably when described as resulting in
"90% survival" rather than "10% mortality." Such effects
are widely considered to be classic violations of rationality. However, if
framing effects are to be considered irrational, it is not sufficient that
the frames in question be logically equivalent. Instead, they must be
information equivalent, which means that no choice-relevant inferences can be
drawn from the speaker's choice of frame. However, logically equivalent
frames used by researchers are often information non-equivalent. For example,
we have shown that a speaker's choice of attribute frame "leaks"
information about relative abundance, and that listeners "absorb"
the information. Information leakage provides a natural (and rational)
explanation of attribute framing effects. Extensions of the information
leakage approach to framing effects in risky choice, inference tasks,
consumer behavior, and policy defaults will also be discussed.
LINKS TO PREVIOUS YEARS’ BEC SPEAKER SERIES:
2004 - 2005 Speaker Series
2003 - 2004 Speaker
Series
BEC Archives
The Behavior, Evolution
and Culture Speaker Series is generously supported by:
UCLA Division of
Social Sciences
UCLA Division of
Humanities
UCLA Department
of Anthropology
UCLA Department
of Speech and Communication Studies
The
Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture (BEC) unites scholars
exploring the connections among evolution, culture, the mind, and society. BEC provides a
framework to facilitate research and training on the interaction among
natural selection, cultural transmission, social relations, and psychology.
To learn more, visit the BEC homepage at http://www.bec.ucla.edu/
Everyone
is welcome to attend, and to volunteer to present research.
To
be added to the BEC list-serv, send
a message to listserv@weber2.sscnet.ucla.edu
with the message (not subject) subscribe BEC your personal
name (not user name).
To be taken off the BEC list-serv, send
a message to listserv@weber2.sscnet.ucla.edu
with the message (not subject) signoff BEC
BEC holds quarterly
conferences with UCSB's sister program in Evolution, Mind,
and Behavior.
Links to previous conferences can be found in the archive.
For related
groups at UCLA, see the Center for
Culture, Brain, and Development , the Program for Psychocultural
Studies and Medical Anthropology , Social
Psychology , and Animal
Behavior.
For a variety of
web-resources exploring the interactions between mind and culture,
see the International Culture and Cognition
Program.
Some
papers to be discussed may be in PDF format, which can be read only if you
have previously downloaded the free Adobe
Acrobat Reader .
This
page is maintained by Daniel Fessler. Email: dfessler "at"
anthro.ucla.edu (insert the @ symbol yourself)
|